Page MenuHomeMiraheze

Change songnguxyzwiki's Content License to CC-BY-SA 3.0
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

As discussed on Community Noticeboard and Discord, we decided to keep as the original and also to project our editors from the 30 days violation healing.
I hate when someone can prove me wrong, but meh-
Despite that, I'm decided to instead: change songnguxyzwiki into CC-BY-SA 3.0 as I'm the only one who are allowed to work on that.

Event Timeline

PiscesKazeMGR created this task.

Changing the License of an open, collaborative project such as a wiki is not exactly trivial; in fact, it's almost impossible in practice if the community wants to keep the project's copyright status clear. If you want to do something like this, the first step is to get *every* editor who ever contributed to the wiki to agree to re-license their contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported (their past contributions will be under a dual-license, the CC-BY-SA 4.0 and the CC-BY-SA 3.0, this is because CC licenses cannot be revoked). This alone is impossible if your wiki takes contributions from anonymous editors (IP addresses), as, in almost all situations, there's no way to verify if the person behind the IP when they edited the wiki is the same one in any future edits.

However, I want to ask you to strongly reconsider this. What problem does the community have with 4.0's 30-day period to correct violations? Aditionally, works under CC-BY-SA licenses can be reused under the terms of future versions of the same CC-BY-SA license. This means that CC-BY-SA 3.0 works can be reused under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 4.0, or even under a theoretical CC-BY-SA 5.0.

I hate when someone come and prove me wrong at most of points.
But despite this, I might reconsider this, but instead change the license for songnguxyzwiki into that, as I'm the only one who are allowed to work on that.

PiscesKazeMGR renamed this task from Change lhmnwiki's Content License to CC-BY-SA 3.0 to Change songnguxyzwiki's Content License to CC-BY-SA 3.0 VN.Wed, Jan 25, 03:48
PiscesKazeMGR updated the task description. (Show Details)

I'm not familiar with CC-BY-SA 3.0 VN. Is that just the same as CC-BY-SA 3.0 but with written in Vietnamese?

The 3.0 family of licenses has various versions. There's the "unported", which is written to be jurisdiction-neutral (like the international 4.0), and there's the "ported" versions, written to take into account the local laws in the jurisdiction they're ported to. The VN port is written to take into account certain Vietnamese laws.

Since Miraheze Limited is a UK company any ported licenses would have to be compatible with UK law. Is there any specific reasons why you absolutely need the ported VN version? Otherwise, we would prefer that you keep the unported version which as OrangeStar says, is jurisdiction neutral.

@PiscesKazeMGR Other than the IP at https://wiki.songngu.xyz/w/index.php?title=Trang_Ch%C3%ADnh&curid=1&diff=38&oldid=28, it seems that you're the only contributor to the wiki, if you delete that edit the wiki should be clear. Please confirm again what license you want.

To be honest, I have no knowledge at these licenses, so as the only one who work on that wiki (and that IP address said above is also me), let's go with the CC-BY-SA 3.0.
And I make that final decision.

PiscesKazeMGR renamed this task from Change songnguxyzwiki's Content License to CC-BY-SA 3.0 VN to Change songnguxyzwiki's Content License to CC-BY-SA 3.0.Mon, Jan 30, 12:03