Anyway, I have already assigned a new bureaucrat for https://radioscanningtw.miraheze.org/ so wish to retire myself there.

Miraheze needs to take the advice of
https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/117744/how-to-resolve-google-indexed-though-blocked-by-robots-txt
then Google would no longer complain.

I'm telling you guys something fishy is up.
I still think Miraheze is being abused.
Checking the logs for just last week
on (My Granny's readonly archive wiki) https://abj.miraheze.org/
are you sure this is normal?

Yes but with robots.txt:

In T5189#121207, @RhinosF1 wrote:

We blocked indexing of all special pages, this was fixed months back.

All I know is anybody who indexes their site with Google should be getting these

Here's what they look like:

Whatever you think is best.

OK I made a workaround.

Anybody have a better way to solve https://phabricator.miraheze.org/T5504#107946 other than one by one entering their name into the box...?

OK, I have converted half of my Talk pages, but can't figure out ( https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T251717 ) a better way to finish the job other than one by one pasting their names into that Special:EnableStructuredDiscussions box and clicking Submit. After which I also need to run it on all my User Talk pages. Anybody got a better way? Thanks.

OK, thanks. And I can confirm another existing page I just converted looks good too.

Alas, it appears the script had no effect...

Thanks. This is a page on the wiki with the problem that you can observe if running the script fixes.

I cannot proceed converting the previously existing talk pages on my wiki until this is done.

Then how about https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgServer ?

Just use https://{{SERVERNAME}}/pagename or #External_links_to_internal_pages , both mentioned on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Links .

OK, on
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:StructuredDiscussions
it says

To enable it on a single page, use Special:EnableStructuredDiscussions. This requires the flow-create-board right, which can be granted to any group

But as you see,

P.S., one also notices raw

Metrolook Bartile
When "Metrolook Down Arrow" is enabled and "Metrolook Bartile" is enabled, the tile menu will be generated from [[MediaWiki:Metrolook-tiles]]. If "Metrolook Down Arrow" is not set and "Metrolook Bartile" is not set, then the tile menu will be generated from [[MediaWiki:Metrolook-tiles-second]].

on the same page.

One finds both
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:StructuredDiscussions
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:EnableStructuredDiscussions

Thanks, but making them clickable has nothing to do with security or what rights one has when viewing the page. It's the same problem if you are the wiki owner or not. They should simply be wrapped in <a href...>'s .

And no, I don't know why a logged in user ended up editing
https://radioscanningtw.miraheze.org/wiki/User_talk:180.217.159.3

Please do the following steps on my wiki:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:StructuredDiscussions#Migrating_existing_pages
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:StructuredDiscussions#Old_Remnants
to fix existing pages.
I see it is already working for new pages:
https://radioscanningtw.miraheze.org/wiki/User_talk:Jidanni

I'm saying that there is a problem with the extension, but I wish miraheze's staff will first isolate the problem, then report it directly to the extension makers.

In T4968#106890, @AmandaCath wrote:

@Jidanni sorry for the non-response since December. Is this still an issue for you?

Yes.
The current way to see what I am talking about is:

1. Browse https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:ManageWiki/settings
2. Click "Styling"

(At first looking at the log it appears you got one wrong.

 21:04, 26 April 2020 Paladox talk contribs block modified the namespace "User" for wiki "radioscanningtwwiki" (Enable flow on User namespace)
 21:00, 26 April 2020 Paladox talk contribs block modified the namespace "<Main>" for wiki "radioscanningtwwiki" (Enable flow on Talk namespace)

Also, within the parentheses mentionined in T5472, perhaps also add a note that one needs to take extra steps after installation. As the user doesn't know if your scripts do all the work or not.

But everything still looks the same. E.,g., this User Talk page.

Indeed, after many actions, e.g.,

OK, I made a note of it.

In T4917#106636, @Paladox wrote:

Implemented now.

Better keep it the same, lest this become a maintenance headache for you guys.
Let's see if other users run into this problem first.

So far so good...

OK, I changed <seo__ to <seo_ (removing one space.)
That fixed whatever was new.

Well all I know is apparently I want this stuff, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T249396 , whatever it is called.

I see, you are saying I should find the appropriate templates, and then use https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Templates#Copying_from_one_wiki_to_another
procedures to copy them to my wiki.

Well all I know is users might discover Special:WikiDiscover by looking at Special:SpecialPages, but then they need a way to learn about Special:Log/farmer, as they probably won't check there themselves.

I also found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:User_link .

Are you saying I should file an issue at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/ ?
But Wikipedia users have been pinging each other for years.
And so can meta.miraheze.org users.
I'm saying that users on *.miraheze.org should be able to ping each other too (on the same wiki.)

OK, though DiscussionTools makes Talk pages look unfamiliar, at least it will do the ~~~~ job.
(In https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_talk:DiscussionTools I do note there is no link to a real description.)

No!
I am saying,
for all sites,
you have a problem.
Google will send a message to all people who use its Webmaster Tools about the problem.
The problem you can read about in the top of this bug report.

The only related setting is on
https://abj.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:ManageWiki/settings#mw-section-restricted
but users can't change it anyway.

OK, do mention Special:Log/farmer on Special:WikiDiscover. But note it is real good for finding the newest wiki, but painful for finding the oldest.

If established dates are not stored anywhere, then certainly some "wiki number" is.

The user could also find which wiki was the very first wiki.

(A workaround for users who have messed up a setting or two would be: find a new (T5351) wiki that nobody had customized yet. Then check Special:ManageWiki/permissions etc. there to see what the defaults are.)

OK created https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T248411 .

Maybe it was due to different settings being available when each wiki was born.

It says "Resolved".
Is there some link to what resolved it?

I see "Resolved".
Maybe the software was updated?
Maybe not?

I see "Resolved".
That's great.
However how did it get resolved?

P.S., if the page is restricted, shouldn't the log also be?

https://radioscanningtw.miraheze.org/wiki/%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A:%E6%97%A5%E8%AA%8C/datadump clearly shows something is wrong,

Which we can't as there is no button to do so.
Unless we remember to go to Special:Specialpages on our own again...

OK, manually hitting ENTER on the browser URL bar's
https://radioscanningtw.miraheze.org/wiki/%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A:DataDump/view/xml
gives us a fresh view: "No dumps have been found, please generate one."

After deleting the dump, the name stays on the screen.

And here we see that it can't be in robots.txt, else Google can't read the <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow"/> ...
https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/117744/how-to-resolve-google-indexed-though-blocked-by-robots-txt

OK, it seems even
<meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow"/>
isn't enough to prevent "Indexed, though blocked by robots.txt"
See https://yoast.com/x-robots-tag-play/

In T5121#97538, @RhinosF1 wrote:

Is there a specific wiki that you want this for?

Here's one that's on every wiki:
$ mech-dump --links https://abj.miraheze.org/|grep ^
login.miraheze.org

In T4926#97338, @Paladox wrote:

Anything else left?

OK!, but
$ w3m -dump https://abj.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RottenLinks?stats=1

Status of external links

I am not saying "please update it for my wiki".
I am saying "please give users a way to update it without needing a Steward's help."