I made a payment of $5, and only $0.47 was charged. Looks like Linode charges $5 for refunds, so can someone just kill the account entirely? Thx.

Maybe this with OpenGraphMeta could work on wiki-level, but hasn't tested.

For clarity, my final payment date is 2019-06-01.

Seems there's no progress on cp3.

IIRC EasyTimeline is insatlled by default on Miraheze. The Meta's CoCC timeline is handled by EasyTimeline.

Hi, can you link the instruction you saw?

This was being tracked by icinga, which triggered me. So it should either 1. remove it from the icinga tracking or 2. tell them to move off Cloudflare.

Even more proof.

Updated one now works.

CN: revi.wiki
SAN: revi.wiki

CSR reader of the CA thinks it's not private.revi.wiki.

both unchecked marks are, as the name implies, obviously Kartographer.

Provide me the new CSR. Will renew later this month.

Not my globaluserpage. I have __NOGLOBAL__ set in metawiki. The point is I do not want anyone's (someone else's) globaluserpage being displayed.

JohnLewis confirmed bot has access to repo.

23:59:33 <@JohnLewis> not really necessary

Please confirm if you need mirahezeprojectnames translated - if so, please fill in qqq.json. Please also confirm you have granted twn bot write access to the repo.

Upstream not interested in relaxing the restriction.

In T3467#65830, @AmandaCath wrote:

In T3467#65824, @revi wrote:

Full Page History is a requirement under the CCL license, "Attribution" clause.

If that’s the case, we should remove the checkbox for “only import the latest revision” from the Special:Import page, assuming that transwiki importing works the same way as dump uploading.

@Bachounda, You will have to contact the technical staff at staff@miraheze.org with your dump files and the link to this task to process import.

Full Page History is a requirement under the CCL license, "Attribution" clause.

Non-priv users can see someone hit the AF, but the details as for 'what' triggered the filter and other details are hidden.

If you mark your filter private, abuselog is visible to those who can see private filters, as far as I know.

Note: T1761: Make "private" wikis actually private

I approved the transfer, but not sure if it will expedite the transfer.

Meh, I was able to remove all the FB, Twitter, LinkedIn myself.

Any particular reason you're banned? Your wiki will need to conform to Content Policy.

@labster use key K4 to initiate the move.

@Reception123 It's really big wiki (XML size of 7GB), give plenty of time for the import.

Got the mail. Will proceed after T3169: Import Nonsensopedia from wikia is complete. (Multiple imports at the same time - our systems will be unhappy with this.)

User accounts are shared across Miraheze system. So if you have account in christipedia.miraheze.org, you can log in with that account / Password in meta.miraheze.org. If your wiki requires users to have specific permissions (i.e. members, editors, ...), you will need to grant those user rights before they can edit.

Fixed by 17bc0500. Proceeding.

Import is failing with below error (tried twice, same error, I assume.)

If they say ‘no’ for LE, just generate CSR. It is not trivial to make it say ‘no’ by mistake, so the intent is clear.

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter#Configuration.

And that’s also possible.

What about just Meta and staff-controlled wikis (testwiki, etc etc)? (And we can contact some big wikis if they are willing to be the target of CN banner? They spend quite a lot of resources, so maybe asking for them to be generous and allow us to run a banner to fund the $$$ sounds not that bad (IMO). Running on the whole platform sounds not that good as Wikipedia tends to get a periodic criticism for running yearly-fundraising-ads.)

This is possible, via configuration editing.

Import is done. Read only status will be unset in 10 minutes.

Page history is being imported. I have no ETA when it will finish. Please instruct your wiki friends NOT to edit until the process is done.

Sysadmins: Use the full revision dump

We got the email.

In T3121#59413, @labster wrote:

IP address can be PII too, especially when tied to a user account. You'd have to get all IPs recorded for all edits from that user. And a list of all edits made by that user -- honestly not sure if we'd have to include the revision text or not.
Am I correct to say that piwik anonymizes IPs when storing them? So essentially, you don't get a full IP address stored there, so nothing could directly tie it back to a user?

That is because: