Tag for issues relating to operation of MediaWiki services.
Thu, Sep 17
Jul 1 2020
Jun 30 2020
Jun 7 2020
WikiLirik sözcüleri eleştirisel pozitif-negatif düşünce karşılaştırma
PyschoLyricWiki Attack Groups
Ben ötesi psikoloji
Aug 31 2018
For my part it is not because the main host is offline.
Aug 27 2018
Aug 12 2018
Aug 2 2018
This is now done and running. Should take changes to take affect 10-20mins.
Jul 22 2018
Im thinking about creating a script under MirahezeMagic that runs and generates the yaml syntax and then pushes to the services repo.
With ManageWiki now active, there is a large inconvenience for the so-called "restricted" tasks, due to having to request them separately at Phabricator.
Jun 27 2018
May 10 2018
They have both been installed now, private wiki's will have to wait until restbase supports private wiki's to use restbase.
May 9 2018
May 3 2018
I just tested it and found the problem no more.
Is this still a problem?
Apr 19 2018
Resolved in the perspective of what we need to do. If it needs more resources, there’s a process for that.
Apr 12 2018
Changing to stalled pending the services to be installed to find out how much ram they will all use :).
Apr 11 2018
@Reception123 we could install Citoid on there and see how much ram it uses first :).
@Southparkfan Another service that I'd possibly like to include is Citoid (or something similar) as there have been many requests for *any* wiki page -> PDF tool, so we would need more resources to accommodate that.
Apr 10 2018
Yes, it is, but I would like to see resource usage myself as well (so that means I haven't approved yet). Shall there be a lack of resources like you've said, I can immediately upgrade without issues.
So Ramnode 2GB SVZS which is $7/mo. I assume this would be pending approval from @labster?
I think 2gb of ram should be good for now judging by https://ganglia.miraheze.org/?r=hour&cs=&ce=&c=Miraheze&h=parsoid1.miraheze.org&tab=m&vn=&hide-hf=false&m=load_one&sh=1&z=small&hc=4&host_regex=&max_graphs=0&s=by+name
I have no objections to renaming. Which plan should this server be on in your opinion?
Feb 7 2018
Jan 3 2018
Dec 16 2017
Apr 24 2017
Oh, I thought it would need opinions of other sysadmins