bump?

Don't know if it's policy to create separate issues on the same topic, but the csp also has two outdated urls for discord:
cdn.discordapp.com and discordapp.com have been changed to media.discordapp.net

PR https://github.com/miraheze/puppet/pull/3444

Looking at the mediawiki account, there is no email attached.

Form has not been filled out. Please reopen once the form has been filled out in its entirety with all questions on the form answered completely. Thanks.

Let's not start here please. What I would say though is that users themselves should decide whether they subscribe to a task, others shouldn't need to decide for them.

In T10577#218198, @OrangeStar wrote:

In T10577#218197, @BrandonWM wrote:

Why was OrangeStar removed as a subscriber? Seeing they have been re-added, so that's good, just was confused as they're a MediaWiki Engineer.

Are you for real? Take a look at Meta's RC and Phab's latest changes

In T10577#218197, @BrandonWM wrote:

Why was OrangeStar removed as a subscriber? Seeing they have been re-added, so that's good, just was confused as they're a MediaWiki Engineer.

Why was OrangeStar removed as a subscriber? Seeing they have been re-added, so that's good, just was confused as they're a MediaWiki Engineer.

OK, well, I have explained it now. Sorry for not catching you before.

In T10577#218176, @Naleksuh wrote:

@Agent_Isai This form is inapplicable. For example, one of the forms asks about "user data" even though there is no user data anywhere there. It is a static site

Removing me from subscribers? Pretty funny.

@Agent_Isai This form is inapplicable. For example, one of the forms asks about "user data" even though there is no user data anywhere there. It is a static site

No response. Please reopen once details are filled in.

@Naleksuh Please fill out the form in this task. Thanks.

@Reception123 For the root domain naleksuh.com, yes, no-one but me can upload any files there. Some of the subdomains and other domains I have do contain wikis and such that anyone can write to. But I am only asking for naleksuh.com right now

Are you able to give assurances that your website does not and will never collect any kind of personal data that would be covered by the GDPR?

In T10551#212505, @BrandonWM wrote:

@Owen To clarify, you mean add “DPA” as an option under the Reports tab? DPA stands for Data Protection, which is already an option on the main bar at TSPortal, though for categorization, not creating a report.

Or do you mean adding it as an option under the “+” button to create a new report, alongside Data Protection and Report?

Or both? (also if that was confusing, apologies, happy to clarify if necessary)

@Owen To clarify, you mean add “DPA” as an option under the Reports tab? DPA stands for Data Protection, which is already an option on the main bar at TSPortal, though for categorization, not creating a report.

In T5869#210999, @Revival wrote:

There are still issues which prevent many images from showing.

Currently only their main domains are whitelisted:

'imgbb.com'
'postimages.org'

However those 2 sites use multiple (sub-)domains to store the images, more (sub-)domains have to be whitelisted.

Regarding imgbb.com, those additional lines are required:

'*.imgbb.com'
'simgbb.com'
'*.simgbb.com'
'ibb.co'
'*.ibb.co'

Regarding postimages.org, those additional lines are required:

'*.postimages.org'
'postimgs.org'
'*.postimgs.org'
'postimg.cc'
'*.postimg.cc'

Thank you.

This task has generated a lot of debate and both sides have been considered, as well as observations by the T&S team in the T9252 task. Unfortunately, I have come to the conclusion that the different concerns expressed by T&S in that previous task have not been sufficiently addressed and the circumstances mentioned haven't changed since then. In addition, a CSP whitelist addition requiring so much debate and back and forth is in itself an indication that there are concerns to be had.

The Move/Purge/Delete tab is usually more familiar to administrators rather than regular users so I wouldn't think it would be a good idea to have it there and also because as Naleksuh says, many skins are different.

@BrandonWM Only the Vector and Vector-2022 skins work like that. No other skins do. Actions are handled outside of skin-specific stuff but it depends on what people want. I thought people wanted something in the toolbox, as otherwise this would too easily repeat the mistakes of the Report extension

There are still issues which prevent many images from showing.

An option is to put the item under the tab that says 'Move', 'Purge', and for sysops on wikis 'Delete', we could add another tab that says 'Report', which would take the user to Special:Report, with the page filled in and all that.

I meant the discussion of how the interface should work, not the discussion of what the rules are.

In T10167#209881, @OrangeStar wrote:

@Owen What elements from the DPA do you want to be able to copy via left-click?

In T9541#210187, @Naleksuh wrote:

@Reception123 Which one could work? The first or the second?

As for "handling the issue", those things are supposed to be discussed rather than decided by whoever is making the feature. I could do whatever makes the most sense to me, but then what happens to everyone else?

@Reception123 Which one could work? The first or the second?